Monday, November 1, 2010

SONY HVR-V1U HDV vs. JVC HM100U



When working with these two cameras, I have learned that there are advantages and disadvantages to working with every camera. Aside from menu navigation, there are many differences between the JVC HM-100U and the Sony HVR-V1U HDV. Workflow, size, media format, chip size, chip type, and camera specifications are examples of differences in these two cameras. With regard to the JVC HM-100U versus the Sony HDV, the most obvious difference is media format. Since the HDV records to miniDV, the workflow is far more tedious, and the margin of error increases. In the past, I have found miniDV capture to be a hassle, and I like to avoid using a tape deck to import footage whenever possible.The HM-100U's ability to record to SD card allows for seamless transfer of files from card to Final Cut. Another great thing about the JVC is that it accepts two SD cards at the same time, and they can be "hotswapped," or changed without ceasing to record. I prefer the JVC to the HDV for this reason, however, the JVC is not faultless. My least favorite feature of the JVC is the lone focus/zoom ring which can only control one of the aforementioned functions at a time. I find this really annoying as I like having the ability to readily adjust the two manually while shooting b-roll and scenic shots. That being said, each of these cameras can be useful in certain situations, however, I enjoy shooting on the JVC HM-100U over the Sony HDV for its reliable workflow and "hotswap" capability.

By clayton with No comments

0 comments:

Post a Comment